Advertisements

Wednesday's snowstorm looked to be just another quick hit and run type of storm, dropping maybe 4-8 inches and scooting out very quickly. By late Tuesday night and into Wednesday morning, things began to change very suddenly, model runs coming in at midnight slowed the storm system down, changed the track and cranked forecast snow totals through the roof! Today I have a look at how this storm evolved, how it played out once it got over Colorado and how it fooled even the most experienced meteorologists up until the last few hours.

Storm Total Snowfall Accumulation

I've provided a couple of maps detailing specifics with snowfall accumulation. Keep in mind, the drifting and blowing snow can leave drifts over 2-3 feet, these numbers do not reflect things like that because they are not accurate measurements. For instance, if I go in my backyard and measure the biggest drift, I would see 30 inches of snow, but a drift is just where snow has piled up from the wind. The NWS has a specific protocol for measuring actual snowfall amounts that does not include drifting, when I use this I got 16.8 inches of snow total.

Official reported snowfall across the metro area for Weds March 23, 2016

Official reported snowfall across the metro area for Weds March 23, 2016 (click on the image to see the larger version)

NWS preliminary snowfall map

NWS preliminary snowfall map

Storm Evolution

This storm through a lot of folks for a loop, even experienced meteorologists had a tough time forecasting this. March snowstorms are notoriously some of the most difficult weather systems to forecast for Colorado, mainly because of their unpredictability. There are a ton of factors that go into making a big snow storm like this and the ingredients have to align just right otherwise we get nothing.

As I go through how this storm evolved, keep an eye out. There are little details that this could become a major storm that nearly every meteorologist missed in Colorado (msyself included.) I'll put these little clues in blue text.

Tuesday Morning

I had posted early Tuesday about a new Winter Storm watch being issued for the front range of Colorado. I took a look at the models and saw an interesting but somewhat unimpressive looking storm system:

 

NAM Radar forecast Weds AM

NAM Radar forecast Weds AM

NAM total snowfall forecast by Weds evening

NAM total snowfall forecast by Weds evening

NAM 4K Radar forecast for Weds AM (Higher resolution model)

NAM 4K Radar forecast for Weds AM (Higher resolution model)

NAM 4K total snowfall forecast by Weds evening

NAM 4K total snowfall forecast by Weds evening

GFS surface winds Weds morning

GFS surface winds Weds morning

GFS_snowfall_03222016_00ZThurs

GFS total snowfall forecast by Weds evening

Many of the models accurately tracked the system moving over the mountains, getting shredded up a bit but then re-organizing somewhere over Eastern Colorado. Nearly all of these models predicted the Low to reorganize in Eastern Colorado or Northwest Kansas. Basically, this storm had potential to bring us good snow, but the models indicated it would re-strengthen and move quickly off to the East.

At one point I posted this graphic from the Euro model:

Euro model low positioning Tuesday night

Euro model low positioning Tuesday night

I even made a remark: "... then along comes the EURO model. This model has been extremely accurate this year, much more so than some of the American and Canadian models."

The Euro showed the storm system setting up in a much more favorable position and with much lower speed. This model had been telling us this for nearly 3 days...wow.

Tuesday Afternoon

The afternoon model runs showed us more of the same. Snowfall totals stayed right in the 4-8 inch range but many showed a pronounced dry slot over the front range foothills. This is a clear signal for downslope flow, which dries out the atmosphere and can erode snowfall quickly.

NAM_03222016_Thurs00Z

I think these model runs were the main reason many of us didn't pull the trigger and up snowfall totals, there were serious questions about who got how much snow. We knew because of the modeling that some areas were going to get dumped on, but Denver and the front range foothills didn't look to be the place.

03232016_snowstormimpacts

As of Tuesday afternoon, the high impact areas were the Palmer Divide (mainly East of Castle Rock) and Northeastern Colorado. We had the areas along the front range as a big yellow question mark, the potential for a big storm was definitely. Based on the data we saw at the time though, it was still 50/50.

Midnight Wednesday

8198034682_7ce18d5294_z

This is when we began to get the first inkling that something big was about to happen. I posted an updated around 1AM with news that every model run across the board had shifted the positioning of the storm and thus cranked up total snowfall quite significantly.

HRRR snowfall accumulation forecast by Weds PM

HRRR snowfall accumulation forecast by Weds PM

I am very hesitant to jump on board the Blizzard bandwagon based on one model run, but in this case it was such a resounding jump by nearly every single model. That plus, the Euro had been picking up on this for days, all the other models had been jumping up and down but were now migrating towards the solution the Euro had been telling us for days now.

Initially I had forecast 4-8 inches, I now jumped my forecast to 6-12 inches based on modeling data and looking at observations and possible dynamics. The models cranked up snowfall, but in the end were still short at this time, as was I with snowfall predictions.

Wednesday Throughout the Day (Storm Arrival)

At this point we knew we were in for a doozy, consecutive model runs had pumped up snowfall accumulation. What caught everyone off guard though I think was, if you left to go to the office early Wednesday morning the roads were not that bad.

Many of us had mentioned it may be worth staying home or delaying your commute because the heaviest stuff, based on modeling would not fall until 6AM-12PM. This caused a lot of people to be out and stuck when the worst of the storm hit.

radar_look_03232016_11am

In the end the storm system re-organized over Eastern Colorado and stalled out. This allowed it to wrap moisture around into Colorado and strengthened up slope enough where we saw some intense bands of snow migrating through the area for most of the day. Again, no models picked up on this at all until midnight Wednesday, except the Euro which was forecasting this as early as Monday night.

The storm finally began moving out Wednesday evening and off to the Northeast to cause some havoc. It left behind closed roads, stranded cars and snowplows by the boatload in ditches.

Wrapping it All Up

As significant as this storm was, it was not by Denver standards a "big blizzard"

Biggest Denver Snowstorms (1881-Present)

Snowfall (Inches)

Dates

45.7

Dec 1-5, 1913

31.8

Mar 17-19, 2003

30.4

Nov 2-4, 1946

23.8

Dec 24, 1982

23.0

Apr 23, 1885

22.7

Oct 20-23, 1906

21.9

Oct 24-25, 1997

21.5

Nov 26-27, 1983

20.7

Dec 20-21, 2006

19.3

Jan 29-31, 1883

19.0

Apr 24-25, 1935

18.7

Mar 5-6, 1983

18.5

Mar 20-22, 1944

18.2

Apr 17-19, 1920

18.0

Mar 19-20, 1907

18.0

Mar 31-Apr 1, 1891

17.7

Nov 19-21, 1979

17.3

Apr 2, 1957

16.9

Mar 20-21, 1952

16.8

Apr 20-22, 1933

16.5

Sep 26-28, 1936

16.0

Oct 3-5, 1969

15.9

Feb 2-4, 2012

15.8

Apr 26-27, 1972

If you look at the top 25 blizzards in Denver, Colorado history, this one doesn't even make the top 25 list.

The snowfall is not what made this a significant storm, I think that was more the combination of snow and wind. We saw gusts upwards of 50mph through the day yesterday and it was this that caused the roads to deteriorate very quickly.

Grading Ourselves

I'm usually my toughest critic when it comes to weather forecasting, but despite the fact that this storm busted way high for snowfall, I think we did a good job communicating the possible impacts.

When we post weather updates we try to communicate more the impacts than the snowfall totals, because that is what will ruin your day if you are out and about. By Tuesday afternoon these were the impacts I communicated:

Heavy snowfall, strong winds up to 50mph, hazardous road conditions especially Wednesday morning.

By Wednesday at Midnight:

  • Heavy snowfall

  • Strong winds up to 60mph, sustained 30-40mph

  • Hazardous road conditions (morning commute may not be too bad yet but as snow falls throughout the day road conditions will deteriorate)

So while the snowfall forecast fell well short, the impacts were certainly there.

B

I give our coverage on this event a B. I think we did a decent job communicating that this storm will make Wednesday very rough. The only tricky part is that by the time we knew snowfall was going to be a bigger issue, my post missed many folks as they were already asleep. Still, I don't like to start hyping up a storm until I have facts that warrant it.

For those of you following along with my clues, you will notice that one model in particular is mentioned in every clue. The Euro model. This model was upgraded recently and in the past some models have really struggled to re-align after a big upgrade. The Euro in this case, was predicting this storm would be significant as early as Monday night.

A lot of meteorologists glossed over the Euro I believe for 2 reasons:

  1. The upgrade, this was the first big storm it was forecasting since its upgrade so we were a bit hesitant about its solution
  2. Out of all the models we look at, this was the only one predicting this type of storm. We often call this an outlier and basing your entire forecast on an outlying model can burn you bad!

For those of you who get updates from me through E-mail or Facebook I'd like to know:

  • The amount of posts

    • Too many, too little, just right?

  • Coverage

    • Would you like to see more or less of something I discuss?

Feedback is greatly appreciated!

 

Stay tuned for a post later today about our next storm system, hitting very, very soon!